
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Call to Arms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dd32.id.au/2009/12/21/a-call-to-arms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dd32.id.au/2009/12/21/a-call-to-arms/</link>
	<description>blog://dd32.id.au/</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 03:11:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19704</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Wordpress 2.9 too quick? The blog of Pross™</title>
		<link>http://dd32.id.au/2009/12/21/a-call-to-arms/comment-page-1/#comment-13187</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Wordpress 2.9 too quick? The blog of Pross™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 21:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dd32.id.au/?p=1724#comment-13187</guid>
		<description>[...] contributor to the WordPress project illustrates this problem quite well in a blog post entitled WordPress, A Call To Arms. I think Dion says it best in the first paragraph which illustrates the lack of testing problem [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] contributor to the WordPress project illustrates this problem quite well in a blog post entitled WordPress, A Call To Arms. I think Dion says it best in the first paragraph which illustrates the lack of testing problem [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Myrstad</title>
		<link>http://dd32.id.au/2009/12/21/a-call-to-arms/comment-page-1/#comment-12415</link>
		<dc:creator>John Myrstad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 09:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dd32.id.au/?p=1724#comment-12415</guid>
		<description>Well, without upgrades you would be using some old version without the features you appreciate and you probably would have been hacked too. Maybe you would be beter suited with a wordpress.com solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, without upgrades you would be using some old version without the features you appreciate and you probably would have been hacked too. Maybe you would be beter suited with a wordpress.com solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

